How Relevant is Performance Appraisal in the Modern Workplace? – Part II

How Relevant is Performance Appraisal in the Modern Workplace? – Part II

The fairness, transparency, and legal compliance associated with performance appraisal contribute to a positive work environment. Here’s a look at how organisations can address these sensitive issues and remain free of biases.


So far, we have discussed how performance appraisal remains highly relevant in the modern workplace due to its significant benefits. As the business landscape continues to evolve, organisations should recognise its importance as a valuable tool for optimising employee performance and driving overall success. Moreover, performance appraisal boosts employee engagement, motivation, and job satisfaction, leading to improved organisational performance. The fairness, transparency, and legal compliance associated with performance appraisal mitigate risks and contribute to a positive work environment.

In this episode, let’s take a look at how organisations can address the sensitive issues of fairness and transparency and keep performance appraisals free of biases.

Ten Commandments for fairness and transparency

Ensuring that performance appraisal processes are conducted with fairness and transparency is essential for building trust, maintaining employee morale, and minimising bias. Here are some key strategies that organisations can implement to achieve fairness and transparency in their performance appraisal process:

  1. Clear and Objective Evaluation Criteria: Establish clear and measurable evaluation criteria that align with job responsibilities and organisational goals. These criteria should be communicated to employees in advance, ensuring everyone understands the expectations and standards by which they will be evaluated.
  2. Training and Calibration: Provide comprehensive training to managers and evaluators on the performance appraisal process. This training should emphasise the importance of fairness, objectivity, and consistency. Conduct calibration sessions to ensure that evaluators have a shared understanding of performance standards and ratings, minimising discrepancies and biases.
  3. Standardised Evaluation Forms: Develop standardised evaluation forms or templates that guide the assessment process. These forms should include specific performance criteria, rating scales, and space for feedback. Standardisation helps ensure that all employees are evaluated using the same criteria, making the process more transparent and consistent.
  4. Multiple Evaluators: Consider involving multiple evaluators in the performance appraisal process, especially for higher-level positions. This approach provides a broader perspective and helps mitigate individual biases or personal preferences. Multiple evaluators can collaborate to ensure a fair and comprehensive assessment of an employee’s performance.
  5. Regular Feedback and Communication: Encourage regular feedback and communication between managers and employees throughout the performance period, not just during formal appraisal discussions. This ongoing dialogue helps address concerns, provide guidance, and keep employees informed about their progress. It also helps prevent any surprises or misunderstandings during the formal evaluation process.
  6. Documentation and Evidence: Maintain thorough documentation of performance-related discussions, achievements, and areas for improvement. This documentation serves as evidence of the appraisal process and provides a transparent record of the feedback given to employees. It also helps managers provide specific examples and evidence to support their evaluations.
  7. Appraiser Accountability: Hold managers and evaluators accountable for conducting fair and transparent performance appraisals. Regularly review the appraisal process and monitor for any signs of bias or inconsistency. Provide guidance and support to managers to ensure they understand their role in promoting fairness and transparency.
  8. Appeals or Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Establish a mechanism for employees to appeal or address any concerns regarding their performance appraisal. This allows employees to voice their opinions, provide additional information, or seek clarification on their evaluation. Having a fair and transparent process for addressing disputes reinforces the organisation’s commitment to fairness.
  9. Diversity and Inclusion Considerations: Ensure that performance appraisal processes consider the unique circumstances and challenges faced by employees from diverse backgrounds. Promote inclusivity by examining potential biases related to factors such as gender, race, age, or ethnicity. Encourage evaluators to focus solely on job-related performance and avoid any form of discrimination.
  10. Continuous Improvement: Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of the performance appraisal process and seek feedback from employees. Make adjustments and improvements based on feedback and evolving best practices. A continuous improvement mindset demonstrates the organisation’s commitment to fairness and transparency.

By implementing these strategies, organisations can establish a performance appraisal process that is fair, transparent, and conducive to employee growth and development. This, in turn, fosters a positive work environment and contributes to overall organisational success.

Common biases to watch out for

Several biases can unintentionally influence the evaluators’ judgments during the performance appraisal process. Being aware of these biases is crucial for organisations to ensure fair and objective evaluation. Here are some common biases to be mindful of:

  • Anchoring Bias: This occurs when evaluators rely too heavily on initial information or preconceived notions when making assessments.
  • Central Tendency Bias: This bias occurs when evaluators rate most employees in the average or middle range of the rating scale, regardless of their actual performance. It can result from a reluctance to give extreme ratings or the lack of differentiation in assessment.
  • Contrast Effect: This happens when an employee’s performance is judged in comparison with other employees rather than objectively. An average performer may, thus, be rated more positively when compared to a poorly performing colleague.
  • Halo Effect: This occurs when judgment is based more on an overall positive impression. For example, an employee who is well-liked or has excelled in one area may be rated positively in other areas as well, regardless of actual performance.
  • Horns Effect: This is the opposite of the Halo Effect. It occurs when an evaluator’s negative perception of an employee leads to an overall negative judgment, even if the employee excels in certain aspects of their performance.
  • Leniency or Strictness Bias: Leniency bias occurs when an evaluator rates all employees more positively than their performance warrants, resulting in inflated ratings. Conversely, strictness bias occurs when an evaluator consistently rates employees lower than their actual performance, leading to deflated ratings.
  • Primacy Effect: It is the tendency to give more weight to information or behaviours observed too early in the evaluation period – leading to disproportionate weightage on initial impressions, overlooking subsequent improvements or changes.
  • Recency Bias: This involves giving more stress on recent events or behaviours – overlooking earlier achievements or persistent patterns of performance.
  • Similar-to-Me Bias: This occurs when evaluators favour employees who are similar to them in terms of background, personality, or interests. It leads to unfairness and hinders diversity and inclusion efforts.
  • Stereotyping Bias: This involves assumptions or judgments about individuals based on generalisations or stereotypes associated with their gender, race, age, or other characteristics–leading to unfair evaluations and discrimination.

To mitigate these biases, organisations should provide training and guidance to evaluators, promote self-awareness, and establish clear evaluation criteria. Encouraging evaluators to focus on objective evidence and providing opportunities for multiple perspectives can also help minimise the impact of biases during performance appraisals.


In Part 3, we will look at some new age approaches to performance appraisal that suits the workplace of the future.

[To be concluded]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2023 Praxis. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
   Contact Us
Praxis Tech School
PGP in Data Science